Webinar Duration: 60 minutes

RECORDED: Access recorded version only for one participant; unlimited viewing for 6 months (Access information will be emailed 24 hours after the completion of payment)

SPEAKER: David R. Dills

OVERVIEW:
Major postmarketing vigilance revisions are now in force. A revised medical device guidance document on postmarketing vigilance (MEDDEV 2.12-1 rev 6) came into force on January 1, 2008.

Providing more guidance than the previous version, the new document includes new reporting terminology and concepts such as “periodic summary reporting” and “trend reporting.” In addition, the terms “advisory notice,” “near incident,” and “recall” have been eliminated or replaced. Although MEDDEVs are not legally binding, it is likely that all European Competent Authorities will follow the new guidelines and will expect organizations involved in the management and reporting of adverse incidents to follow them as well. This session will address topics such as new definitions; the guideline’s extended scope, reporting criteria/timelines, filing safety notices and field safety corrective actions, and more.

The new guidelines contain some controversial aspects, including the extension of their scope and the new approach of immediate reporting unless delays can be justified. However, they also provide additional clarity and more-detailed advice in many areas. The European Database EUDAMED also is described. Periodic or trend reporting under certain conditions is now allowed, as a result of the integration of certain GHTF concepts. Although a transition period was allowed until the end of 2007, the revised guidelines will undoubtedly result in the need for manufacturers, authorized representatives, and distributors to make changes to their SOPs and other documents.

Areas Covered in the Session:
– Examine the latest changes to MEDDEV and Medical Device Vigilance and impact on medical device manufacturers
– Recognize the “new” terminology and concepts
– Report incidents as recommended by the guidance
– Examine why Global Harmonization Task Force (GHTF) is an integral component of the new postmarketing vigilance guidelines
– Manage expectations for reporting and timelines
– Recognize which amendments impact the European vigilance system
– Interpret the new guidelines that cover incidents involving devices that carry the CE mark and devices that do not carry the CE mark
– Submit periodic summary reports of incidents to Competent Authorities
– Examine controversial aspects of the guidelines, including the extension of their scope and the new approach of immediate reporting unless delays can be justified
– Identify the conditions under which reporting is not required and why they have been expanded and clarified with no significant changes, although one reason has been removed

Who Will Benefit: This webinar will provide valuable assistance and guidance to device companies in involved in vigilance reporting. Employees who will benefit include:
All levels of management and departmental representatives and those who desire a better understanding or a “refresh” overview
– Regulatory Affairs
– Clinical Affairs
– Quality and Compliance
– Marketing & Sales
– Distributors
– Engineering/Technical Services/Operations
– Consultants

SPEAKER PROFILE:
David R. Dills,Global Regulatory Affairs & Compliance Consultant currently provides regulatory affairs and compliance consultative services for early-stage and established Class I/II/III device, IVD, biopharmaceutical, cosmetics and nutraceutical manufacturers on the global landscape, and has an accomplished record with more than 27 years of experience in the areas of Regulatory Affairs, Compliance and Quality Systems. He has been previously employed, with increasing responsibilities by device manufacturers and consultancies, including a globally recognized CRO and has worked directly with manufacturers engaged in compliance remediation activities involving consent decrees, CIA’s, warning letters, and customer generated compliance events, conducts QS, regulatory, compliance assessments/audits and FDA Mock Inspections for State of Readiness.

He has been directly involved with constructing, reviewing, and remediating regulatory submissions, U.S. Agent for OUS companies, works closely with the key stakeholders and Agency/Center Reviewers regarding submission meetings and negotiations; clinical affairs/CTM and provides regulatory submissions and post-market project leadership and guidance covering multiple therapeutic and medical specialties based on classification. He has a strong background in the interpretation and applicability of FDA and international regulations, leads activities for the registration and approval process and working with the Agencies in Asia Pacific, EMEA and The Americas, including FDA, European Medicines Agency–EMA, MHRH, ANVISA, PMDA, MOH, CFDA, TGA, and Health Canada and works with management on regulatory strategies and plans supporting a company’s commercialization strategy. He directs and leads efforts for PM support involving all phases of the premarketing to postmarketing; establishes Medical Device Single Audit (MDSAP), UDI, and Digital Marketing/Promotion/Advertising compliance strategies; lead efforts regarding AE/Incident Reporting, all aspects of Postmarketing Surveillance and Vigilance Reporting; establish QMS and documentation systems for GxP compliance; ISO 13485 registration and CE Mark, Technical File, Design Dossier and CER consultation; and facilitates multi-country product registrations and licensing.

He recommends action to senior leadership to ensure effective resolution for manufacturers to achieve sustainable and proven compliant systems. Background encompasses broad capabilities in quality systems; documentation development and remediation; regulatory oversight and governance; design controls; CAPA investigations; GxP training; software embedded medical devices/all aspects of SW/SDLC and process validation with compliance oversight; supplier management; and demonstrates credible experience to optimize business performance through proactive strategies to mitigate compliance exposure. Mr. Dills has served on the Faculty Advisory Board for the Pharmaceutical Training Institute, Editorial Advisory Boards for Software Quality Professional and the Institute of Validation Technology (IVT), publisher of the Journal of GXP Compliance and Journal of Validation Technology and on the Readers’ Board for Medical Device & Diagnostic Industry and Medical Product Manufacturing News and was nominated and accepted for inclusion into the 2005-2006 Strathmore’s Who’s Who of Professionals.

Mr. Dills has authored and published validation, regulatory and compliance-related articles, commentaries and technical guides, and is an accomplished global industry presenter. Mr. Dills’ academic degrees include Environmental Science and Biology. He is a former Chair and Co- Chair of ASQ’s Section 1506 and affiliated with the Biomedical Division, RAPS, AdvaMed, PDA, ISPE, and other industry working groups.