Webinar Duration: 60 minutes

RECORDED: Access recorded version only for one participant; unlimited viewing for 6 months (Access information will be emailed 24 hours after the completion of payment)

SPEAKER: Charles H. Pierce

With the increasing complexity of therapeutic agents -now involving more “biologics” -and an increase of use of new agents beyond the original intention and testing, it is essential to know and follow the “good Clinical Practices of Clinical Research, which includes the proper documentation of any untoward and unexpected Adverse Events and other serious toxicities.

The adage of Forewarned is Forearmed clearly applies. Focus areas would be how you assure Investigator involvement, site protocol adherence, appropriate safety assessments, and methods for data sampling including internal audits. This means that the site/CPU is GCP compliant .

Why should you Attend: There is a very real increase in the mandated frequency of real-time requests by the FDA for audits and inspections of clinical trials and it seems that no one is well prepared. It is now reasonable to expect that the Sponsor’s should become more discerning regarding the qualifications and training of the staff of any unit conducting studies on human volunteers. Investigators, as well as all site staff, must know how to assess how well the unit is complying with the regulation and the essence of GCP to assure the safety of the volunteers as this ultimately affects the safety of the public. Following GCP is also an assurance of a clean audit.

Areas Covered in the Session:
– What was the reason the ICH was formed
– What is the essence of GCP
– How does You QA group insure GCP
– The PI/Investigators role in GCP
– The Sponsors role in GCP
– What is the end result of Dose response studies
– Does you Unit/CPU/CRU follow the 13 IVH Principles?
– How following the signed Protocol is GCP

Learning Objectives:
– Provide an understanding of the concept of “Good Clinical Practice” (GCP)
– Compare the GCP responsibilities of principal investigator with the sponsor in clinical investigations
– Ensure that support personnel have a clear understanding of how and why the work they do is governed by local and federal regulations
– Contrast what your site does to prepare for a GCP audit with what is proposed in this Webinar

Who Will Benefit:
– Principal Investigators and Sub Investigators
– Clinical Research Scientists (PKs,Biostatisticians)
– Research Managers
– Safety Nurses
– Clinical Research Associates (CRAs) and Coordinators (CRCs)
– Recruiting Staff
– QA/QC Auditors and Staff
– Study Monitors & Clinical Research Data Managers

Charles H. Pierce MD, PhD, FCP, CPI is a consultant in the Clinical Research / Drug-Device Development arena specializing in bringing the message of GCP Regulations and Investigator Responsibility to the entire investigative team to help them understand the regulations as well as the ethics of research involving human subjects. From an original Master’s thesis (Pharmacology) in 1961 (Minnesota) through a Doctorate in Surgery-Pharmacology in 1974 (Saskatchewan) and continuing throughout 48+ years in the practice of clinical medicine as a family physician (7 years as an ER doc) and 27+ years in the medical research industry (7 years as a Principal Investigator), Charles has an experienced based knowledge of the Clinical Research part of Drug Development.

He is an APPI/APCR Certified Principal Investigator (CPI in 2003 and recertification’s to 2018). He is frequently actively involved in Webinars, courses and workshops giving the clinical investigator and staff an understanding and appreciation of the ethics as well as the science and regulations governing clinical research with drugs or devices. The end must be knowledge and keen observation to ensure drug safety. Charles’ active management experience in the medical research industry gives him first-hand practical experience and knowledge to develop Phase I, IIa confined study Clinical Pharmacology Units (CPU’s). From experience and practical know-how the special needs of these units (from the floor plans to operational SOPs) has been of added value to those considering this venture. He has work experience in Device Studies and Pharmacovigilance. The later (PV) is of special interest as Phase I through Phase III do not guarantee drug safety. Actually this vigilance must start with the very first studies in human subjects.

Charles is a Fellow and Life Member of the American Academy of Family Physicians and Emeritus fellow of the American College of Clinical Pharmacology (ACCP) of which he was a Regent 1995-2000, Chairman of the 2001 annual meeting, and the 2004 recipient of the Nathaniel Kwitt Distinguished Service Award. He is an active member of the Association of Clinical Pharmacology Units (ACPU) of which he was a trustee (2007-2011) and chaired the successful 2010 annual meeting. He is also a member of the Academy of Physicians in Clinical Research (APCR) and the 2012 Chair of the Board to trustees of the Academy of the Association of Clinical Research Professionals (ACRP).